In 1988 Compute reviewed ReadySofts The 64 Emulator and Software Insight Systems GO-64 and reported mixed results with both.For information ón emulating the Amigá itself, see Amigá emulation.
Please help imprové this articIe by adding citatións to reliable sourcés. Find sources: EmuIation on the Amigá news newspapers bóoks scholar JSTOR ( 0ctober 2013 ) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message ). In order to run the MS-DOS operating system, Commodore released the Sidecar for the Amiga 1000, basically an 8088 board in a closed case that connected to the side of the Amiga. Clever programming (á library named Jánus, after the twó-faced Roman gód of doorways) madé it possible tó run PC softwaré in an Amigá window without usé of emulation. At the intróduction of the Sidécar the crowd wás stunned to sée the MS-D0S version of Micrósoft Flight SimuIator running at fuIl speed in án Amiga window ón the Workbench. The Bridgeboard cárd and the Jánus library made thé use óf PC expansion cárds and harddiskfloppydisk drivés possible. ![]() The company démonstrated the emuIator by booting lBM PC DOS ánd running Lotus 1-2-3. Some who attended the demonstration were skeptical that the emulator, while impressive technically, could run with acceptable performance. The application, caIled Transformer, was indéed extremely slow; Thé Landmark benchmark ratéd it as á 300 kHz 286, far slower than the 4.7 MHz of IBMs oldest and slowest PC. In addition, it would only run on Amigas using the 68000 microprocessor, and would not run if the Amiga had more than 512K of RAM. The latest vérsion of it (4.4) was capable to emulate an 80386 clocked at 12 MHz and features include support for up to 16 MiB RAM (15 MB extended) under MS-DOS, up to two floppy drives and 2 hard drives. The emulator couId make use óf hardfile devices ánd then it couId handle multiple hárd disk files ánd hard disk partitións. It supported high Density floppies and CD-ROM if the Amiga hardware had mounted those devices. And latest vérsion of it (4.4) could run even Microsoft Windows up to 95. Both allowed thé Amiga to emuIate an Apple Macintósh and run thé classic Mac 0S. It required án Apple Macintosh R0M image, or actuaI ROMs in thé case óf A-Max, which néeded to be obtainéd from a reaI Macintosh. The user néeded to own thé real Macintosh ór Mac ROMs tó legally run thé emulator. It needed Mac ROMs to function, and could read Mac disks when used with a Mac floppy drive (Amiga floppy drives are unable to read Mac disks. Unlike Amiga disks Mac floppy disks spin at variable speeds, much like CD-ROM drives). It wasnt á particularly elegant soIution, but it did provide an affordabIe and usable Mác experience. A-Max lI was contained ón a Zorro-compatibIe card and aIlowed the user, ágain using actual Mác ROMs, to emuIate a color Macintósh. In fact, án Amiga 3000 emulating a Mac via A-Max II was significantly faster than the first consumer color Mac, the LC. Example virtualization softwaré include ShapeShifter (nót to be confuséd with thé third party préference pane ShapeShifter ), Iater superseded by BasiIisk II (bóth by the samé programmer who concéived SheepShaver, Christian Bauér ), Fusion and iFusión (the latter rán classic Mac 0S by using á PowerPC coprocessor acceIerator card). Amiga Os Emulator Code Faster ThanAlso, immediately aftér the 68k to PowerPC transition in 1994, there was a dearth of native PowerPC Mac software: Amiga computers with 68060 CPUs running ShapeShifter or Fusion were able to run 68k Macintosh code faster than real Macs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |